#Splunk inc lawsuit pro#
#Splunk inc lawsuit software#
#Splunk inc lawsuit trial#

#Splunk inc lawsuit pro#

IT Pro has approached Splunk for comment. Its service Cribl Stream is used by DevOps engineers and other industry professionals in order to process data in real time, supply context to data, and encrypt sensitive fields. Last year it announced a new cloud security suite in addition to its other offerings.Ĭribl supplies data management solutions to its customers, aiming to provide data flexibility and stack observability.

It also aims to improve observability across multi-cloud environments.

Splunk operates in more than 21 regions internationally, providing customers with a suite that provides oversight over their data and allows them to conduct big data analytics. There is nothing that will turn off investors more than a high-profile IP dispute! Either way both parties will now need to prove their position and live with significant costs if they fail.” 'Alternatively, this may be a strategic move to dry up investment and other financial support in Cribl.

#Splunk inc lawsuit software#

'A former employee would be incredibly foolish to use a carbon copy of code he has misappropriated rather he would likely recode the software to deliver substantially similar functionality. 'Proving infringement of copyright in source code, as Splunk is alleging here, tends to be difficult,' said Michael Buckworth, founder at UK law firm Buckworths.

#Splunk inc lawsuit trial#

The company has requested a trial by jury. It has also requested an accounting of the profits that Cribl has made from the activity and subsequent damages. Splunk has requested an injunction against Cribl, Clint Sharp and all associated Cribl entities, from further infringing Splunk copyrights. While Splunk tries to stifle competition through litigation, we will keep our relentless focus on our customers to give them choice and control over their data.' 'We have built interoperability using our own hard work and open source implementations, such as Eventgen. 'The allegations in Splunk’s lawsuit are false, and we will defend against these baseless claims,' Cribl stated in a blog post. Using copies of the software to determine source code would constitute a violation of the terms of agreement. However, the TAP program agreement states that partners may only use the software to demonstrate the use of extensions with the software and to develop extensions further. Cribl's momentum may be a catalyst for the timing of this lawsuit, given ARR growth at 300 Y/Y in February and tripling its customer base, including 10 of the Fortune 50 (Splunk's core market). It characterises Cribl’s actions as a “coordinated campaign of misappropriation” and claims that the company used Splunk’s Technology Alliance Partner (TAP) programme to further its theft.Īfter launching in 2017, Cribl joined the TAP program, an agreement that allows partners to add to Splunk’s Enterprise platform, through the use and limited copying of Splunk software. In a blog post, Splunk alleges that it attempted to settle the matter privately, but that this was unsuccessful.